翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 ・ Employers and Workmen Act 1875 ・ Employers Group ・ Employers of Poland ・ Employers' Association of Greater Chicago ・ Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 ・ Employers' liability act of 1880 ・ Employers' organization ・ Employment ・ Employment (album) ・ Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law, 1988 ・ Employment (short story) ・ Employment Act 1980 ・ Employment Act 1982 ・ Employment Act 2002 ・ Employment Act 2008 ・ Employment Act of 1946 ・ Employment Agencies Act 1973 ・ Employment agency ・ Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate ・ Employment and Skills Group ・ Employment and Social Development Canada ・ Employment and Social Insurance Act ・ Employment and Support Allowance ・ Employment and Training Act 1948 ・ Employment and Training Administration ・ Employment Appeal Tribunal ・ Employment authorization document ・ Employment consultant ・ Employment contract Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Employment Act 2008 ： ウィキペディア英語版 Employment Act 2008 The Employment Act 2008 (c 24) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which reformed a wide range of different provisions of UK labour law. It is an amending statute, and therefore simply altered pre-existing law to remedy perceived problems in the law's operation to do with dispute resolution, strengthen enforcement of the minimum wage and employment agency standards and to conform with updated case law on trade unions, in particular, ''ASLEF v United Kingdom''.〔() IRLR 361〕 ==Sections 1-7, dispute resolution== Through the Employment Act 2002 the government had introduced a mandatory statutory dismissal procedure, which had been designed to be followed in any case. If employers did not follow the procedure before dismissing their employees, the dismissal would be deemed automatically unfair. In practice it proved that employers did not follow the mandatory procedure (which was essentially a warning, a hearing and a right to an appeal) and business was adamantly opposed to the measure. Section 1 repealed that part of the EA 2002 (and with it ERA 1996 s 98A) and instead gave tribunals a discretion to adjust the award by 25% if an employer had not complied with the Code of Practice for its industry on dismissal procedure (s 3). It also changes procedure for ACAS and employment tribunals. Essentially ACAS need only endeavour to reach a settlement, rather than having to reach a settlement and if someone does not turn up for a tribunal hearing both parties consent, then a judgment can be given by the tribunal without the expense of the hearing (ss 4-7). 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Employment Act 2008」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.